Dr. Samira Al-Mobayed: The recent changes in the coalition aim to create an entity with subordination to Turkey and the Gulf states.. All opposition frameworks are part of the previous pillars of tyranny

What are the real reasons for the recent changes in the Syrian opposition coalition?

The recent changes in the Syrian opposition coalition reflect the formulation of a new formation that is compatible with new consensus and alliances of countries that seek to dominate the Syrian issue to achieve their interests through it, and we witness accordingly efforts to create an entity with subordination to Turkey and the Gulf states at the same time to formulate a new form of dependency or a state of pluralist mandate over Syria, and this required excluding people with affiliation to other parties.

Is the formation of a parallel entity of the “dismissed persons” aimed at overthrowing the opposition coalition?

Replacing the dismissed people with people who achieve these endeavors is the likely scenario within the ranks of the Syrian coalition. There is little differentiation between the excluded and those who might be replaced by them in terms of dependence. Therefore, this political entity will remain far from achieving the interests of the Syrians because it is manufactured  according to its main mission to serve the interests Non-Syrian on Syrian soil.

How do you view the statement of the Minister of Interior in the Interim Government about the presence of members of the coalition working for the Syrian government?

I think that the existence of a case of penetration of the opposition by the regime is an obvious result of restricting the Syrian movement within the frameworks of the same old system.

All opposition frameworks without exception are part of the previous pillars of tyranny and are based on the same mechanisms and behaviors, so it is not excluded that these leaks are real, and it is necessary for those concerned to reveal the proofs they have of that.

Will the coalition’s sponsors begin to abandon it after the recent leaks?

I think that the lack of confidence in the coalition on the part of the Syrian street is the most important criterion for not relying on it to be part of any future solution path, whether the dismissed bloc, the remaining bloc or the bloc that might be brought to it, these frameworks are not trustworthy and constitute an extension of the regime.

It is possible for the countries involved in the Syrian issue to realize that the matter will not be correct without the presence of a Syrian party that carries the principles of change away from the dominant and conflicting ideologies today, and that those seeking stability in the region realize that the continued absence of the independent Syrian voice is nothing but a prolongation of the security and humanitarian deterioration throughout the countries of the region with its It has a negative impact around the world as well.